Free for the Asking

Understand how Harmony can bring together the left and right sides of the brain

Why did TQM Fail?

-  Employees take their cues from mgmt. more
-  Executive & middle mgmt. oversights more
-  Didn't integrate quality into organizational structure more

Why do major change initiatives fail?

-  Part 1: The eight major reasons for failure.
-  Part 2: Consequences of these errors?

Confessions of a shot messenger

Data "Sanity": The Need for Statistical Thinking in Everyday Work
Summary: A quality improvement context invalidates many assumptions perpetuated through traditional, research-oriented university statistical courses - hence rendering many common analyses inappropriate! Resulting stigma from such past, usually mandated, courses also represents a formidable cultural barrier to the effective data collection, analysis and results-implementation so necessary to improvement.

This all-day seminar will introduce a deceptively simple, elegant - and initially quite counter-intuitive - approach to statistics as an organizational framework for expanding improvement efforts.

Outline of course content:

  • You are already using statistics - Recognizing poor and ineffective data displays,
  • Implicit assumptions of "traditional" statistics - Research vs. Quality Improvement - and the need for process-oriented thinking... including the data process,
  • The issue of "sample size" is moot,
  • A "series of meetings" based on real data from commonly-encountered situations to gain insight into eight hidden organizational statistical "traps" and facility in simple run charts, control charts, and p-charts for understanding:
    • The deceptiveness of percentage data,
    • The danger of arbitrary numerical goals and rankings,
    • Proper meanings of the terms "trend," "above average," and "below average,"
    • The power of simply "plotting the dots" to assess Common & Special causes impairing process predictability,
    • The art of asking more incisive questions.
Format of session: Lecture (35%), intense dialogue (30%), and participant small-group work (35%)

Back to Services

"This was dynamic. It really defined quality running on empty. I never would have imagined to look at why until I attended these sessions. He is a very energetic speaker and speaks from the heart."
Some participant comments from December 2001 sessions given at the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s annual U.S. forum

email: davis@dbharmony.com
All rights reserved dbHarmony.com