![]() |
|
Free for the Asking
Why did TQM Fail?
Why do major change initiatives fail?
|
Executive Team Assessment
Score your self on a scale of 1-5 with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "Absolutely." To what extent are you prepared to:
If your score was less than 45 points, don't bother packing yet - you're not going anywhere. If you set out now, you'll just strand everyone in the wilderness and build better cynics for the next time you announce a new destination. You and your management team need to take a serious look at what is blocking your commitment and work to strengthen it before you say anything to anyone about higher service/quality. If your score was between 46 and 55 points, you need to be cautious. There may not be enough commitment to take your organization through the long haul. A frank discussion of what is holding back full-scale commitment is needed. Range of executive commitment: 1. Permission This allows managers or staff support people to proceed as long as it doesn't cost too much and disrupt the "real business." 2. Lip service This level of commitment gives speeches and writes memos exhorting everyone to improve service/quality. Some budgets and resources are allocated to a piecemeal series of improvement programs. There is no strategic service/quality improvement plan, the process is not part of operational management's responsibilities, and the executive is not personally involved in education or training. 3. Passionate lip service The executive attends an abbreviated overview of the training being given to everyone else. Some elements of a deployment process are shakily in place. Passionate stump speeches urge everyone to "get going." 4. Involved leadership The executive attends all training first in its entirety then gets trained to deliver the introductory education and awareness and skill-development sessions. Service/quality improvement is the first item on all meeting agendas and priority lists. Managers are held accountable and rewarded for their contributions to continuous improvement. The executive group leads the process management process. There is a strong and comprehensive deployment process - infrastructure, planning and reporting, and assigned responsibilities - in place. 5. Strategic service/quality leadership Day-to-day operating decisions have been delegated to the myriad of increasingly autonomous improvement teams. The majority of the executive's time is spent with customers, suppliers, teams, and managers gathering input for long-term direction and "managing the organization's context" by providing meaning through the vision and values.
Reprinted with permission of The CLEMMER Group and Jim Clemmer (www.clemmer.net/speaking/speakjim.shtml). Jim is a best-selling author, keynote speaker, and workshop/retreat leader. Over 200 or his columns and articles are available at www.clemmer.net/articles.shtml. The CLEMMER Group (www.clemmer.net) is a management consulting firm specializing in organization, team, and personal transformation. The firm provides strategic consulting, performance assessments, improvement/implementation planning, action-based learning workshops, and executive coaching to accelerate organization improvement. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Enlightening, enjoyable, a fun way to learn this." Participant comments from a March 2002 seminar at the Association for Quality and Participation’s national conference |
||||
| email: davis@dbharmony.com |
| All rights reserved dbHarmony.com |